[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: identity persistence and comparison issues




El 28/06/2004, a las 14:45, Erik Nordmark escribió:


What if we just always show the application a long-lived identifier,
even though when it sets up a session we use ephemeral identifiers?

That's part of what Jukka and I were pondering a bit. I think it is very interesting; just need to make sure that the additional local mapping on the host from the long-lived to the ephemeral doesn't introduce attacks that we don't know how to handle.


Terminology questions: the application would only use the stable (long lived) id, right?
The ephemeral id is internal to the multi6 layer, and it is not handled by the ULP, right?
would then this ephemeral id would be an id, or is this simply a key or a token, just as in IPSec or pbk?


regards, marcelo

If
the application then doesn't do referrals there is no issue as the
long-lived identifier doesn't leave the host. If it does "contact me at
xxx" type referrals there is also no problem as xxx is the long-lived
identifier so the reference remains valid over (a reasonable amount of)
time. Only in the case of "you'll hear from me and I'm xxx" type
referrals wouldn't work, but those won't work reliably in the presence
of multiple addresses anyway.

And if the long-lived ID is one of the locators we can provide compatbility
for unmodified applications which do referrals and callbacks.


Erik