[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")

To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:34:12 +0200
Cc: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, address-policy-wg@ripe.net, multi6@ops.ietf.org, Sascha Luck <ripe-lst@eirconnect.net>
In-reply-to: <40D888A1.7070901@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
References: <40D8185A.7030900@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <E7618C9F-C445-11D8-860C-000A95928574@kurtis.pp.se> <40D82BE0.90404@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <0B9FE26D-C44E-11D8-860C-000A95928574@kurtis.pp.se> <40D83B58.90906@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <73777057-C456-11D8-860C-000A95928574@kurtis.pp.se> <40D84781.8020604@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <2A874E04-C466-11D8-860C-000A95928574@kurtis.pp.se> <20040622185835.GC6204@Space.Net> <40D888A1.7070901@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Hi,

On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 04:29:37AM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Note that routers in NLIs may have less performance than those
> in TLIs.

Why?

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  60210  (58081)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster@Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>

References:
- Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: optimum routing table size
Next by Date: Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
Previous by thread: Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
Next by thread: Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread