[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question re HIP dependency [Re: about Wedgelayer 3.5 / Fat IP approaches]

Jari,

(This also responds to your other message.)

We're not voting on solutions; my question was about
dependencies. Building on an undeployed dependency is a serious
decision for any WG to take, especially one in the Operations
Area.

Brian

Jari Arkko wrote:
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

Unless I'm mistaken HIP is still work in progress so that doesn't help. 


Is your intent to choose the multi6 protocol from only those
solution candidates which have already been defined and
completed? Please point me to the RFCs ;-)

--Jari