Re: how much privacy do we need? (was Re: Advantages and disadvantages of using CB64 type of identifiers

To: Multi6 List <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: how much privacy do we need? (was Re: Advantages and disadvantages of using CB64 type of identifiers
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 12:20:06 +0200
In-reply-to: <9E29D2EE-D18B-11D8-A131-000D93ACD0FE@it.uc3m.es>
Organization: IBM
References: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1089313119.9718.nordmark@bebop.france> <9E29D2EE-D18B-11D8-A131-000D93ACD0FE@it.uc3m.es>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:

Now, just to mix things a bit more, how would a solution

> like NOID support the privacy requirements? Are the DNS times
> compatible with this requirement?

I'm not sure we have consensus that we even have a privacy goal,
except maybe the "do no harm" property compared to RFC 3041.

Brian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: how much privacy do we need? (was Re: Advantages and disadvantages of using CB64 type of identifiers
  - From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
- Re: how much privacy do we need? (was Re: Advantages and disadvantages of using CB64 type of identifiers
  - From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>

References:
- Re: Advantages and disadvantages of using CB64 type of identifiers
  - From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
- how much privacy do we need? (was Re: Advantages and disadvantages of using CB64 type of identifiers
  - From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>