Food for thought

[Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>]

Please don't start a discussion of renumbering here, but I think
many of the operational considerations about adding and dropping
prefixes in the referenced draft are likely to apply also to
any multihoming solution.

    Brian

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-renumbering-procedure-01.txt
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 15:34:14 -0400
From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
CC: v6ops@ops.ietf.org

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the IETF.

	Title		: Procedures for Renumbering an IPv6 Network without a Flag Day
	Author(s)	: F. Baker, et al.
	Filename	: draft-ietf-v6ops-renumbering-procedure-01.txt
	Pages		: 24
	Date		: 2004-7-9
	
This document describes the steps in a procedure that can be used to
transition from the use of an existing prefix to a new prefix in a
network. It uses IPv6's intrinsic ability to assign multiple
addresses to a network interface to provide continuity of network
service through a make-before-break transition, as well as addressing naming and configuration management issues. It also uses 
other IPv6 features to minimize the effort and time required to complete the transition from the old prefix to the new prefix.

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-renumbering-procedure-01.txt


<<< Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-v6ops-renumbering-procedure-01.txt": Unrecognized >>>
_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce