[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: On the use of multiple PA prefixes or a single PI prefix for IPv6 multihoming

To: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
Subject: Re: On the use of multiple PA prefixes or a single PI prefix for IPv6 multihoming
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:00:24 +0200
Cc: multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20041022124332.ACA8786B00@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
References: <20041022124332.ACA8786B00@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>

On 22-okt-04, at 14:43, Noel Chiappa wrote:

So the trick is to select the best one, or at least avoid the bad ones. How do we do this?

There is an answer, but you won't like it! :-)

I wasn't aware that I'm so set in my ways that people can predict whether I'll like something in advance... So let's hear it, I'm interested to know if you're right. (-:

References:
- Re: On the use of multiple PA prefixes or a single PI prefix for IPv6 multihoming
  - From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)

Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-haddad-momipriv-problem-statement-00.txt]
Next by Date: Re: On the use of multiple PA prefixes or a single PI prefix for IPv6 multihoming
Previous by thread: Re: On the use of multiple PA prefixes or a single PI prefix for IPv6 multihoming
Next by thread: Re: On the use of multiple PA prefixes or a single PI prefix for IPv6 multihoming
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread