[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments on draft-ietf-multi6-v4-multihoming-02



At 03:26 AM 11/11/2004, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
john.loughney@nokia.com wrote:
Hi Iljitsch,
...
So what I meant more was that if we use keep-alives at the multi6
layer, then perhaps this could be something that the upper layer
could set the keep-alive behavior.  However, I still don't know if
you are suggesting that we use keep-alives at the multi6 layer
(in some circumstances) or if you would kick this up to the application
layer.

IMHO: In a modular multi6 design, this shouldn't be prescribed. The connectivity detection component might use keep-alives on Tuesdays, SNMP traps on Wednesdays, and hints from the ULP the rest of the week. This really should not become an architectural choice.


precisely - and I believe that this was noted in the architecture draft

  Geoff