[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPR (Was: Re: Comments on draft-bagnulo-multi6dt-hba-00.txt)

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   On 15-nov-04, at 16:50, Jari Arkko wrote:
   
   >> PS: BTW CGA IPR holders provide royalty-free licenses only for SEND,
   >> can they update their IPR texts on the IETF web for HBAs too?
   
   > FYI: I have asked the Ericsson IPR department to inform the
   > IETF about their licensing conditions regarding the HBA draft
   > and usage in MULTI6.
   
   Shouldn't we try to determine whether the patent even applies in the 
   first place?
   
=> as the HBA idea is an extension of the CGA one, I can't see how the
patent can apply to CGA but not to HBA... No, the problem is real,
but it should very easy to fix with a better wording in the IPR note.

Thanks

Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr