Re: IPR (Was: Re: Comments on draft-bagnulo-multi6dt-hba-00.txt)

[Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>]

 In your previous mail you wrote:

    > => as the HBA idea is an extension of the CGA one, I can't 
    > see how the
    > patent can apply to CGA but not to HBA... No, the problem is real,
    > but it should very easy to fix with a better wording in the IPR note.
    > 
   
   => I think Microsoft also made claims about CGA, so I'm not
   sure if the Ericsson IPR statement alone will be sufficient.
   
=> Microsoft IPR uses the standard form and the b clause is checked for
both royalty free, ... and limitation to standard track documents so
IMHO it is less critical.

Thanks

Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr