Re: Mini WGLC draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-threats-02.txt

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>]

On 1-dec-04, at 19:58, Erik Nordmark wrote:

> I think we should reword the above sentence to say that the 
> identifiers are not tightly bound to an interface; to provide 
> communication survivability when one interface fails the identifiers 
> must be usable on any interface.

> (I welcome suggestions for how to make that text shorter.)

An identifier continues to function regardless of the state of any one 
interface.