-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2005-01-17, at 09.42, Pasi Sarolahti wrote:
This would support a larger set of possible re-homing scenarios, and I think it is compatible with the wordings of re-homing definition in draft-ietf-multi6-architecture-03.txt.
I had a short off-list mail exchange with Marcelo and Jari and they agreed, but recommended to solicit the list opinion as well.
I have no objections to the text leaving this possibility open,
ditto
but I have some more concerns about actually implementing this.
In a sense, it's to leave this door open that I've been arguing over on shim6 that we should separate the state machine (and by implication, its APIs) from the shim6 protocol.
Brian