Re: Ever onward

[Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>]

Eliot Lear writes:
>>   5.1: End of message directive
>>      Status: Need some sort of framing; is "<?eom?>" or "&&" sufficient?
><?eom?> seems to be good enough.  Reasons for the other?

Nope.  It's a little easier to find/parse and it's a character
sequence that simply cannot appear in an xml document, guaranteeing
that any valid xml can be tossed into the message body without
testing/escaping it.  A little simpler and more foolproof, but
not worth arguing over.

Thanks,
 Phil

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>