Re: Ever onward

[Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>]

Juergen Schoenwaelder writes:
>Perhaps this needs to be revisited. Using a new port number, at least
>for the SSH mapping, makes really sense to me. It also avoids this
>"invocation of NETCONF as an SSH subsystem called "netconf" language
>in the mapping document which never really made me happy.

I like the subsystem mechanism, since it avoids interacting
with the user's login shell, dot files, etc.  But it should
definitely use a distinct port.

Thanks,
 Phil

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>