[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue 13.3.1 -- I say "go for it"

To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Issue 13.3.1 -- I say "go for it"
From: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 00:04:38 -0500
Cc: netconf <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 06 Feb 2004 17:02:17 EST." <40240EE9.9060605@cisco.com>

Eliot Lear writes:
>The notion of a "create" operation is not new, dating back to at least 
>O_CREAT/creat(2), and possibly the days of Benjamin Franklin.  SNMP has 
>it for good reason, and we should have it as well.  Do people really 
>need to be sold on it?

I'd be against requiring an explicit create.  Implicit
creation is fine for >90% of the cases and the other
<10% can do a query to see if the target exists.

Thanks,
 Phil

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Issue 13.3.1 -- I say "go for it"
  - From: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>

References:
- Issue 13.3.1 -- I say "go for it"
  - From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: NetConf Data Modeling Discussion
Next by Date: Re: Ever onward
Previous by thread: Issue 13.3.1 -- I say "go for it"
Next by thread: Re: Issue 13.3.1 -- I say "go for it"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread