[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue 13.3.1 -- I say "go for it"

To: lear@cisco.com
Subject: Re: Issue 13.3.1 -- I say "go for it"
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 20:38:43 +0100
Cc: netconf@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <40240EE9.9060605@cisco.com> (message from Eliot Lear on Fri, 06 Feb 2004 17:02:17 -0500)
References: <40240EE9.9060605@cisco.com>

>>>>> Eliot Lear writes:

Eliot> The notion of a "create" operation is not new, dating back to
Eliot> at least O_CREAT/creat(2), and possibly the days of Benjamin
Eliot> Franklin.  SNMP has it for good reason, and we should have it
Eliot> as well.

IMHO, SNMP does not have a real create operation (just a side-effect
hackish mechanism to work around this lack) and I believe that this is
one of SNMP's real shortcomings...

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany



--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

References:
- Issue 13.3.1 -- I say "go for it"
  - From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Issue 7.1: Mandatory-to-implement criteria
Next by Date: Re: Ever onward
Previous by thread: Re: Issue 13.3.1 -- I say "go for it"
Next by thread: RE: Issue 13.3.1 -- I say "go for it"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread