Re: comments on version 2 of protocol draft

[Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>]

>>>>> On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:15:25 -0800, Rob Enns <rpe@juniper.net> said:

>> Consequently, my personal vote is that defaults be eliminated and
>> that all values, operations, options be required to be explicitly
>> defined.  For a computer, its not big deal; for humans, it adds a
>> lot of clarity.

Rob> I agree with this. Does anyone on the list have a problem with 
Rob> removing the default parameter values?

Well, since the XML encoding is already going to be a unreasonable
bandwidth explosion and we don't care about parsing speed of all those
extra parameters, why not?

[or, you could just include the parameters if you don't remember the
defaults and use them when you do remember...]


-- 
"In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap,
 and much more difficult to find."  -- Terry Pratchett

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>