Re: comments on version 2 of protocol draft

[Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>]

>>>>> On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:10:50 -0500, Bobby Krupczak <rdk@krupczak.org> said:

Bobby> I do not see the point in further arguing over the topic.

Now, that I agree with.  We're not going to come to agreement as our
needs differ.

Bobby> Do you think to-default or not to-default would make the spec
Bobby> more widely or less widely deployed?  I dont think this issue
Bobby> will effect adoption.

I think this, along with other directions that have been taken, will
prevent netconf from being deployed in some environments, yes.  But I
don't work in the same environments you do.  We've proven that well
enough.

-- 
"In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap,
 and much more difficult to find."  -- Terry Pratchett

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>