[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: comments on draft-ietf-netconf-prot-02.txt

To: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: comments on draft-ietf-netconf-prot-02.txt
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 11:23:23 -0800
Cc: Rob Enns <rpe@juniper.net>, netconf@ops.ietf.org, j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
In-reply-to: <6.0.3.0.2.20040309104605.02789628@fedex.cisco.com> (Andy Bierman's message of "Tue, 09 Mar 2004 11:11:55 -0800")
Organization: Sparta
References: <20040306222856.GA2806@iu-bremen.de> <20040309184311.GE42828@sapphire.juniper.net> <6.0.3.0.2.20040309104605.02789628@fedex.cisco.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, linux)

>>>>> On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 11:11:55 -0800, Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com> said:

Andy> We have no get-next, and we don't want lexinext ordering, so we
Andy> don't want get-next

You can have a get-next without lexinext ordering.  Check out any
database cursor implementation (or my solution under EOS).  SNMP
imposed lexicographical ordering, which is something that no other
database has done.

-- 
"In the bathtub of history the truth is harder to hold than the soap,
 and much more difficult to find."  -- Terry Pratchett

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

References:
- comments on draft-ietf-netconf-prot-02.txt
  - From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
- Re: comments on draft-ietf-netconf-prot-02.txt
  - From: Rob Enns <rpe@juniper.net>
- Re: comments on draft-ietf-netconf-prot-02.txt
  - From: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: comments on draft-ietf-netconf-prot-02.txt
Next by Date: Issue 11.1.2: URI vs. URN
Previous by thread: Re: comments on draft-ietf-netconf-prot-02.txt
Next by thread: Re: comments on draft-ietf-netconf-prot-02.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread