Re: Issue 11.1.2: URI vs. URN

[Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>]

On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 12:29:26PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:

[...]
 
> [ ed. -
>  So http://ietf.org/netconf/base/1.0 would be encoded as:
> 
>  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf/base/1.0  
> 
> (I'm asking ???)
> ]

I think it would be 

	urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0
or
	urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base-1.0

Anyway, we would actually define a sub-namespace for netconf (which I
think is a good idea) and we probably still need to document the rules
how this sub-namespace is managed (IANA considerations saying that
assignments need WG concensus or something like that).
 
> [
>  So the schema file associated with the base namespace
>  might be identified by:
> 
>  urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:netconf/base.1.0.xsd  (?)
> ]

I think it would be

	urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:netconf:base:1.0
or
	urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:netconf:base-1.0

The comment above applies here as well. Note that there is no need
for the .xsd extension since it is clear from the prefix that this
refers to an XML schema. 

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>