Re: comments on draft-ietf-netconf-prot-02.txt

[Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>]

On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 08:43:56AM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:
 
> I think we have WG consensus that we should remove this restriction
> from the protocol draft.  Instead, the draft should say that
> it is a data-model specific matter as to which operation types
> are valid at which granularity, etc.  In other words,  
> this is a data model (not protocol) conformance issue.

So what is the rationale to move this into the data model space?

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>