[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 14.1: Retrieval Subset specification proposal
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 10:52:26AM -0500, Glenn Waters wrote:
> > (a) protocol operations (verbs) that have clear semantics
> > (b) payload that is just data not does not define verbs
> If I understood the previous work correctly the above two items are
> essentially what has been proposed in this working group in the past. The
> opposing proposal was the Weijing Chen (et. al.) (SBC) proposal where I
> believe verbs were included in the data. Weijing's proposal was shot down.
The current specs use special attributes in the payload data to indicate
whether something is going to be replaced, modified or deleted during
an edit-config operation. This is what I am talking about.
> > (c) sequences of operations to achieve a complex edit/retrieval
> > (d) if really necessary, add a compound operation to group things
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>