[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: comments on draft-ietf-netconf-prot-02.txt
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 02:19:27PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:
> The application is NOT forced to put all configlets
> into 1 edit-config. I don't want to force the
> application writer to use 1 or N PDUs. I want the
> application writer to decide how many PDUs to use.
> If they want to put a "create(foo)" and "delete(bar)"
> in the same PDU, then why should the protocol (which
> is supposed to be data model independent) place all kinds
> of restrictions on data models, and prevent this?
I think we actually agree on the usefulness of allowing applications
to determine the unit of an RPC interaction. My critique was on a
slightly different topic.
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>