Re: same value operation attributes restriction

[Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>]

I hesitate to get into this debate again, but...

Randy Presuhn wrote:
> I don't see how a bundle of creates / merges / updates is guaranteed
> to be any more "complete" than the set of variable bindings conveyed
> by an SNMP set request, unless you're making some serious information
> model assumptions in the protocol.  

This would be the old "test & set" argument replayed?!  I don't need to 
know the program to know that test & set is good for locking, right? 
Certainly the guy who invented the old touch and link hack in UNIX 
didn't think so...





--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>