[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cross-protocol locks
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 09:19:17AM -0400, Harrington, David wrote:
> Has anybody proposed an SNMP lock-mib that would provide an SNMP
> interface to the global locks that NETCONF expects to use?
[...]
> The need for a lock-mib raises a larger question. Other
> protocol-developing WGs are expected to provide a MIB for
> monitoring/managing the new protocol. Will this WG provide a mib for
> monitoring/managing NETCONF?
Once NETCONF is done, we probably need a (readonly) netconf MIB which
might export among other things the status of NETCONF locks. I do not
think it is worth to come up with the generic and general lock-mib,
especially since locking semantics are usually delicate.
At this point in time, it is probably too early to worry about such a
MIB as NETCONF still has some rough edges that need to be worked out.
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>