Re: unified transaction model proposal

[Bobby Krupczak <rdk@krupczak.org>]

Hi1

> global. 
> 
> I think it will be imperative to be able to manipulate different
> portions of the configuration simultaneously, so globally locking global
> configurations, like running, are a problem. We discussed this at the
> interim and it has been raised multiple times on the mailing list. I
> believe we will need partial configuration support, with locks to
> support that.

I thought David's questions on cross-management-platform locks to be
right on the money.

However, in my own dealing with this issue, I always assumed this was
an internal matter and that SNMP agents, operating systems (e.g. IOS),
and netconf agents, would do this behind the scenes rather than making
this locking mechanism externally visible.  Is this not the case?

Bobby

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>