[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: sub-tree filtering proposals

On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 03:31:23PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:

> The problem with XPath (as we went through before)
> is that we are not going to specify a NETCONF-only subset
> of XPath.  We are not going to require every box to
> implement XPath.  This subtree filtering is intentionally
> very limited so it's easy to implement.

You do not want to subset XPATH to reduce the implementation costs and
at the same time you propose a different filter mechanism to reduce the 
implementation cost (which at the end might map to a subset of XPATH).

OK, lets not restart this discussion without a beer. Lets see whether 
there are any other technical comments on your proposal. It seems this
mailing list is way too quiet.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>