Re: Comments on Application Mapping I-Ds

[Ted Goddard <ted.goddard@icesoft.com>]

Note that "SOAP" is no longer an acronym, it's now just "SOAP".
However, as of SOAP 1.1, it was "Simple Object Access Protocol".

Does that warrant expansion?

Ted.



On 16-Aug-04, at 10:04 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:

> At 08:45 PM 8/16/2004, Randy Presuhn wrote:
> > Hi -
> >
> > > From: "Margaret Wasserman" <margaret@thingmagic.com>
> > > To: "Eliot Lear" <lear@cisco.com>
> > > Cc: <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
> > > Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 7:34 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Comments on Application Mapping I-Ds
> > ...
> > > Do you think we have to expand NETCONF?  Or that we can get away with
> > > claiming that NETCONF _is_ the fully-expanded name of the protocol?
> > ...
> >
> > I think it would be better to expand it.
>
> Agreed.  The full title should be:
>
>    Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)
>
>
> > Randy
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
>
> > --
> > to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
> > the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> > archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
>
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>



--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>