[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: NETCONF WG minutes for IETF #60
It sounds like a reasonable approach to me.
Rob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org
> [mailto:owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sharon Chisholm
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 6:04 AM
> To: netconf@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: NETCONF WG minutes for IETF #60
>
> hi
>
> I agree it should be kept in the protocol draft until we are
> sure what's
> going on with netmod, but I would have some concerns if the
> document was
> published with the content. My main concern is the risk for
> contradictory
> requirements. We could make it a non-normative appendix with a big old
> disclaimer for now and worry about it when we get closer to
> publication.
> Perhaps an editor's note to remind us to revist the issue?
>
> Sharon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Bierman [mailto:abierman@cisco.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 5:24 PM
> To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:5K50:EXCH]
> Cc: netconf@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: NETCONF WG minutes for IETF #60
>
>
> At 01:17 PM 9/3/2004, Sharon Chisholm wrote:
> >hi
> >
> >The minutes say that instead of removing the stuff in
> section 7 of the
> >protocol draft since we (netmod) want to include it in our content
> >discussion
> >
> >"Instead, a warning in each section
> >will be added to explain that a NETCONF data modelling
> standard document is
> >expected to supercede this text at some time in the future."
> >
> >I don't remember that. Was this just until our stuff
> progressed to be
> >working group documents? That almost sounds familiar. This protocol
> >draft wouldn't go to RFC with the duplicated text would it?
>
> We did discuss this a little bit -- we don't want the data
> model stuff to
> disappear until (if and when) a NETMOD WG is formed and
> produces a document
> to replace this text. I think these sections should remain
> in the NETCONF
> protocol document as non-normative appendices.
>
>
> >Sharon
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Andy Bierman [mailto:abierman@cisco.com]
> >Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 12:22 PM
> >To: proceedings@ietf.org
> >Cc: netconf@ops.ietf.org
> >Subject: NETCONF WG minutes for IETF #60
> >
> ><clip>
> >
> >--
> >to unsubscribe send a message to
> netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with the
> >word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> >archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
>
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
>
>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>