Re: subtree filtering question

[Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>]

Li Yan <liyan_77@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have reviewed the following discussion.
> I found that Andy's answer conflict with the example in 6.4.7 of rfc4741.

This was a discussion which was resolved later.


> Section 6.4.7 says:
>    The "barney" subtree filter contains three containment nodes
>    (<users>, <user>, <company-info>), two content match nodes (<name>,
>    <type>), and one selector node (<dept>).  The subtree selection
>    criteria is not met because user "barney" is not a "superuser", and
>    the entire subtree for "barney" (including its parent <user> entry)
>    is excluded from the filter output.
> 
> Should the empty <user> node be removed?

Yes.


/martin

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>