Re: subelements

[Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>]

Andy Bierman writes:
>no -- there is no mention in the RFC of this extensibility feature
>that does not officially exist.  I remember (way back when ;-)
>that Phil convinced us that
>  <source><running/></source>
>was better than
>  <source>running</source>
>It had something to do with making it easier to define an XSD
>that was a subset of the standard configurations.

IIRC, my argument was exactly as above, that using elements
gives us extensibility.  It's unfortunate that the xsd doesn't
reflect this, but my view is that capabilities can extend the
base protocol so this isn't really a problem.

Thanks,
 Phil

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>