RE: FW: [NGO] Netconf-Proxy

["David B Harrington" <dbharrington@comcast.net>]

Hi,

I didn't say anybody had tried to add proxy to Netconf, or that it was
desirable.

You made a statement that operators said they HATED SNMP proxy. I
wanted to see documentation of that statement from operators. Or is
that just your opinion? I'd like ti to be clear whether it is
aomething the operators said or something you said.

dbh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Bierman [mailto:ietf@andybierman.com] 
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 7:50 PM
> To: David B Harrington
> Cc: 'Romascanu, Dan (Dan)'; 'Netconf (E-mail)'; P.Batroff@gmx.net
> Subject: Re: FW: [NGO] Netconf-Proxy
> 
> David B Harrington wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Is that operator opinion documented somewhere? I checked 
> RFC3535, the
> > IAB Workshop on Network Management, but found no mention of 
> proxy. Was
> > that input captured in some netconf meeting minutes?
> 
> no - the discussion at the IAB NM workshop did not make it 
> into RFC 3535.
> Nobody has ever seriously suggested adding a proxy mechanism 
> to NETCONF,
> similar to SNMP Proxy.
> 
> 
> > 
> > dbh
> > 
> 
> Andy
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org 
> >> [mailto:owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andy Bierman
> >> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 10:35 AM
> >> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> >> Cc: Netconf (E-mail); P.Batroff@gmx.net
> >> Subject: Re: FW: [NGO] Netconf-Proxy
> >>
> >> Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> >>>  This question is probably more within the scope of netconf 
> >> rather than
> >>> ngo. 
> >>>
> >>> Dan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Philipp Batroff [mailto:P.Batroff@gmx.net] 
> >>> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 4:16 PM
> >>> To: ngo@ietf.org
> >>> Subject: [NGO] Netconf-Proxy
> >>>
> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>> Hash: SHA1
> >>>
> >>> hello,
> >>>
> >>> i have the Problem, that iam developing a box (similar to a 
> >> proxy) with
> >>> a Netconf-agent, which redirects request to several 
> >> different agents.
> >>> The problem is, that this box has just one IP-address.
> >>> How can I divide between the different agents? Is there a 
> >> wrapper, where
> >>> i can specify the "target" behind that proxy, or is there 
> >> anything else
> >>> possible?
> >>> I want to stay conform with the Netconf standard.
> >> You can put whatever XML attributes you want in the <rpc>
element.
> >> NETCONF has no concept of proxy. Operators told us they hate
> >> SNMP Proxy and want nothing like it in NETCONF.
> >>
> >> Andy
> >>
> >>> Thank you and greets Phil
> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
> >>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> >>>
> >>> iD8DBQFGyZQO9Os+BmHRimYRAoHrAJ4sKkIPPXRy6OlX12FsIwQz/kaVnQCcDlLV
> >>> P1//yS1JJKXNfKh6mFtiyis=
> >>> =wcc5
> >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> NGO mailing list
> >>> NGO@ietf.org
> >>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org
with
> >>> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text
body.
> >>> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org
with
> >> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> >> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 



--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>