RE: is a warning really an error?

["Kent Watsen" <kwatsen@juniper.net>]

> I think you are reading the document too literally.

Yes, I tend to read specifications that way  ;^)


> You can add this to the issue tracker for RFC 4741 if you want.

I will add all of these items to the issue tracker


> Clearly you have figured out that data-model dependent error handling
> for the NETCONF protocol is largely undefined in RFC 4741.
> This is partly by design, and partly because NETCONF data modeling
> is largely undefined.

I don't see this as being dependent on the data-model as I'm only caring
if the target datastore was modified on not


> (Insert plug here for draft-bierman-ncx-smi-00.txt ;-)

Ever so subtle!  ;)


Best,
Kent


--
Kent Watsen
Software Architect
Juniper Networks

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>