Re: Comments on notification-09

[Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>]

Li Yan <liyan_77@huawei.com> wrote:
> o Sec 5.1, the first example, the filtering criteria evaluation should be
>   ((fault & severity=critical) | (fault & severity=major) | (fault &
> severity=minor))

I agree.  There are two examples in 5.1 and two in 5.2.  I guess that
they are supposed to be equal, i.e.  the first in 5.1 and the first in
5.2 are supposed to be the same test, expressed as a subtree filter
and xpath filter respectively.  Thus I suggest that the evaluation
criteria used in those sections are exactly the same.

For the first example in 5.1. and 5.2, I suggest you use

  (fault & ((severity=critical) | (severity=major) | (severity=minor)))

For the second example, I suggest you use

   (state | config | (fault & (card=Ethernet0)))

Maybe even align the text describing those examples...


> o Sec 5.1, the second example, the following XML segment should be deleted,
> because there is no this filtering criteria in the foregoing evaluation
> expression.
>           <event xmlns="http://example.com/event/1.0";>
>             <eventClass>fault</eventClass>
>           </event>

I agree.



/martin

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>