[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [NGO] RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-iijima-netconf-soap-implementation-03.txt
Hi,
>> I would indeed encourage you to continue the work on this document,
>> to present it at the Vancouver meeting. When you feel it is ready and
>> complete for submission I will be glad to sponsor it as AD in order
>> make it an Informational RFC.
Thank you for encouraging us!
We'll complete the work as soon as we can and be ready to present it.
> Stupid question: Did you do any interoperability testing of your
> NETCONF over SOAP implementation?
Regretably, not yet.
Personally, I think interoperability will be ensured since we are using
WSDL of the RFC4743 and XSD of RFC4741. Anyway, I'd like to touch upon
the issue of interoperability.
Kind regards,
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:08:00PM +0200, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>
>> I would indeed encourage you to continue the work on this document, and
>> to present it at the Vancouver meeting. When you feel it is ready and
>> complete for submission I will be glad to sponsor it as AD in order to
>> make it an Informational RFC.
>
> Stupid question: Did you do any interoperability testing of your
> NETCONF over SOAP implementation?
>
> What NETCONF really needs are I think interoperability tests and test
> cases and such things. This would really help to ensure NETCONF
> engines do the same thing and the specs lead implementors to the same
> conclusions. And we need to find a way to deal with those things
> implementors found either not well described or more complex than it
> needs to be.
>
> /js
>
--
Tomoyuki Iijima
Hitachi, Ltd. Central Research Laboratory
TEL:+81-42-323-1111 ext.3579
FAX:+81-42-327-7868
E-mail:tomoyuki.iijima.fg@hitachi.com
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>