Re: [NGO] NETCONF-related sessions at IETF 70

[Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>]

"Sharon Chisholm" writes:
>Either that or for more detailed discussion of the items in the updated
>NETCONF charter.

Another thought is to come up with a list of the five biggest
impediments to NETCONF's complete domination of the configuration
space.  Do we know the answers to questions like:

- Why aren't/won't device folks shipping netconf implementations?
- Why aren't/won't application writers moving to NETCONF?
- Why isn't NETCONF becoming the answer to configuration problems?
- What's stopping it?
- Where's the chicken?
- What's the egg?
- What's the key to moving forward from here?
- Where should we be concentrating our (precious and few) resources?
- Will any of the new charter items be on this list?

Thanks,
 Phil

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>