[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments on Partial Locking -01

To: Sharon Chisholm <schishol@nortel.com>
Subject: Re: Comments on Partial Locking -01
From: Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:53:26 +0100
Cc: netconf@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B41227010B@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
References: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B41226FBA6@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com> <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B41227010B@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070604)

Hello Sharon,
See below!
Balazs

Sharon Chisholm wrote:

Hi

Another comment, we may want to say that a partial lock can cause a full
lock to fail.

[BALAZS]: From the main Netconf RFC chapter 7.5:
      An attempt to lock the configuration MUST fail if an existing
      session or other entity holds a lock on any portion of the lock
      target.


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

References:
- Comments on Partial Locking -01
  - From: "Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortel.com>
- RE: Comments on Partial Locking -01
  - From: "Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortel.com>

Prev by Date: schema discovery
Next by Date: Re: partial locking and access control
Previous by thread: RE: Comments on Partial Locking -01
Next by thread: Re: Comments on Partial Locking -01
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread