Re: Comments on Partial Locking -01

[Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>]

Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net> wrote:
> Martin Bjorklund writes:
> >I mentioned a possible use case in
> >http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/netconf.2007/msg00708.html
> 
> My concern is less with overlapping partial locks than with
> the interaction between global and partial locks.

Good!  I think we all agree that we don't want to change rfc4741, and
thus we should not allow any overlaps between partial locks and the
global locks.  A global lock MUST fail even if the same session has a
partial lock and a partial lock MUST fail even if the same session has
the global lock.


/martin

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>