[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
review of draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring-00.txt
Here is my initial review. Mainly editorial/administrative
for now.
- general. There are quite a few ID-NITS as per:
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netconf/draft-ietf-netconf-monitoring/draft-ietf
-netconf-monitoring-00.nits.txt
- general. I wonder.... is this all we want to write for these type
of content models? I.e. just the schema and no explanatory text
in english as to what the schema represents?
- It seems that wherever you have citations, you have omitted
white psace. For example
[NETCONF]can be ...
described in[RFC2119].
Element: An[XML]Element.
- By the way, I personally like citations of the form [RFC4741] better
than of the form [NETCONF], because that way I can quicker pick up the
referenced RFC. Best I think would be to change
[NETCONF] can be ...
into
NETCONF [RFC4741] can be....
Anyway, I know this is subjective so will respect your choice.
- I think that in the Security COnsiderations you should be more specific
as to what kind of data/information we speak about and explain how/why
that data is a possibly security risk when in the wrong hands.
- For
[NETCONF-EVENT]
Chisholm, S. and H. Trevino, "NETCONF Event
Notifications", ID draft-ietf-netconf-notifications-06,
February 2007.
I have already posted that the "s" is not part of the
name of the WG draft (i.e. currently it is
draft-ietf-netconf-notifications-11, NOV 2007)
- For
[XML Schema]
Fallside, D. and P. Walmsley, "XML Schema Part 0: Primer
Second Edition", W3C XML Schema, October 2004.
would you not want to add a ptr to the website? I think it is:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/
- Good news. The schema seems valid:
Schema validating with XSV 3.1-1 of 2007/12/11 16:20:05
Target: file:/usr/local/XSV/xsvlog/tmprFp4kbuploaded
(Real name: C:\bwietf\netconf-wg\monitoring-schema.xml)
docElt: {http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema}schema
Validation was strict, starting with type [Anonymous]
The schema(s) used for schema-validation had no errors
No schema-validity problems were found in the target
Not that that means I can read/understand it.
That will be a next step, after which I may have more
comments/questions.
Bert Wijnen
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>