[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: bug in notification-11 XSD
Hi, I don't recall why the version numbers are not in but I went back to
check and they used to be present in the earlier releases of the doc. I
agree they should be included if nothing else for style purposes.
Hector
-----Original Message-----
From: Sharon Chisholm [mailto:schishol@nortel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 7:51 AM
To: Bert Wijnen - IETF; Hector Trevino (htrevino); Andy Bierman
Cc: Netconf (E-mail)
Subject: RE: bug in notification-11 XSD
Hi
I believe this was discussed previously. Version numbers are included
for protocol definitions, not for the content definitions.
Sharon
-----Original Message-----
From: Bert Wijnen - IETF [mailto:bertietf@bwijnen.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 9:45 AM
To: Chisholm, Sharon (CAR:ZZ00); Hector Trevino (htrevino); Andy Bierman
Cc: Netconf (E-mail)
Subject: RE: bug in notification-11 XSD
Sharon (or Hector), I have not seen you react to this at all. What is
the story here?
Andy, is this about these 2 lines on pages 17/18
xmlns:manageEvent="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netmod:notification"
targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netmod:notification"
and the corresponding line in IANA considerations:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netmod:notification
I'd like to understand from the authors what their reason is to not be
consistent as Andy suggests.
If that gets changed, then I suspect that the otehr occurences in the
rpc messages need to be changed too, no?
Bert Wijnen
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org
> [mailto:owner-netconf@ops.ietf.org]Namens Andy Bierman
> Verzonden: donderdag 14 februari 2008 20:17
> Aan: Netconf (E-mail); Bert Wijnen - IETF; Sharon Chisholm
> Onderwerp: Re: bug in notification-11 XSD
>
>
> Andy Bierman wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just noticed that the targetNamespace is wrong in the first XSD in
> > this draft. It is missing the ':1.0' suffix that is present in the
> > 'ncEvent' URI.
> >
> > (Not that this reaffirms my belief that XSD is a mistake factory ;-)
> >
>
> oops -- I was looking at ncEvent but I should have been looking at
> manageEvent. The XSD is okay but I think the WG should pick a URI
> style (with or without version numbers) and stick with it.
>
>
> > Andy
>
> Andy
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with the
> word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>