[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NIM requirements/conventions (was Re: Methods in the NIM requ irements)
- To: WWeiss@lucentctc.com
- Subject: Re: NIM requirements/conventions (was Re: Methods in the NIM requ irements)
- From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 09:09:00 +0200
- CC: nim@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Fri, 05 May 2000 00:09:41 -0700
- Envelope-to: nim-data@psg.com
>>>>> Weiss, Walter writes:
Walter> Your question also seems to imply that this question could be
Walter> addressed at some later point (say after a WG is formed). It
Walter> is these types of issues that determine the ultimate success
Walter> of a WG. I, for one, would prefer to resolve these issues to
Walter> prove the viability of a WG and determine the degree to which
Walter> the various interests are willing to compromise.
For me, writing guidelines now is like writing a tutorial for a piece
of software before you did the requirements analysis and specification.
I personally would never do that - but this is of course no reasons to
stop others from trying it if they believe that this is essential for
the ultimate success of a (not yet existing) WG.
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Technical University Braunschweig
<schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> Dept. Operating Systems & Computer Networks
Phone: +49 531 391 3289 Bueltenweg 74/75, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Fax: +49 531 391 5936 <URL:http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/~schoenw/>