[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
reminder if you have asked for or will ask for an agenda slot in Yokohama
- To: ops-area@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: reminder if you have asked for or will ask for an agenda slot in Yokohama
- From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 04:59:10 -0700
good advice
From: Loa Andersson <loa.andersson@utfors.se>
To: mpls wg <mpls@UU.NET>, George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>,
Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
Subject: reminder if you have asked for or will ask for an agenda slot in Yokohama
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 15:11:33 +0200
All,
just a short reminder to those who have or are requesting agenda
slots at the MPLS WG in Yokohama. Please consider this when you
prepare for the meeting.
It is not the purpose of a WG session to have
presentation of the content of a document. It
is assumed that all attendees will have read the
drafts in advance of the meeting.
For documents that are work-in-progress, the
presentation should cover issues resolved since
the last draft followed by open issues and
controversial topics with the intent to reach a
resolution of said issues and topics.
For new work items, the presentation should focus on
what the problem is and why it is necessary for the
work group to address it. Further it should be either
shown how it falls within the existing charter or why
and how the charter should be extended to encompass it.
The solution should only be sketched.
The appropriate way of bringing new work to the working
group is to send a draft to the mailing list and promoting
discussion on the list. Slots on the agenda should be used
to discuss outstanding topics that has not be solved on the
mailing list.
For new proposals addressing issues where
work-in-progess the presentation should focus
on the (perceived) short-fallings of the existing
work and why those issues need to be addressed
both in terms of why they are required and why they
cannot be addressed in the existing work.
the new work must be related to existing work (i.e.
compatible, mutually exclusive, outright replacement).
Finally, the new solution should be skechted,
explaining how the solution overcomes those issues.
The primary purpose of this last part is to allow commentary
from the floor, it should not be orientented toward selling
the idea.
In all cases only a limited number of slides should be used.
Speakers should budget their at least 25% of their time to
allow for questions.
Loa and George
--
Loa Andersson
Chief Architect,
Utfors Research, Architecture and Future Lab (URAX)
Utfors AB
Råsundavägen 12
Box 525, 169 29 Solna
Office +46 8 5270 2000
Office direct +46 8 5270 5038
Mobile +46 70 848 5038
Email loa.andersson@utfors.se
WWW www.utfors.se