Re: WG Last Call: a batch of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv4survey-*01 documents(fwd)

[Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>]

>>>>> Pekka Savola writes:

Pekka> Feedback & Review is sought.  Please take a look at the ops
Pekka> IPv4 survey document:
                                                                               
[...]

Some comments:

(a) RFC 1157 is HISTORIC and should probably be excluded.

(b) RFC 1155 has been obsoleted by RFC 2578-2580, also full
    standard. RFC 1155 has not been retired since other documents
    still depend on it.

(c) RFC 1213 has been split into multiple modules. The IP version
    neutral definitions are being developed in the IPv6 working group
    and hopefully soon go to last call.

(d) Regarding RFC 2578: It would be useful to point to RFC 3291 which
    contains the TEXTUAL-CONVENTIONs designed to replace the SMIv2
    IpAddress base type.

(e) Note that RFCs 1905, 1906, 1907 have become STANDARD in the
    meantime. See RFCs 3416, 3417, 3418.

(f) Note that RFC 3419 provides TC that can be used to specify IPv6
    transport domains, similar to SnmpUDPAddress in concept.

(g) Note that RFC 1611 and 1612 are HISTORIC.

(h) RFCs 2011, 2012, 2013 will be replaced. See comment (c) above.

(i) RFC 2564 should really be updated to use RFC 3419 TCs. (But this
    is probably already in solution space.)

Hope this helps,

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany