[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: IPR and Copyright Statements
However, I am just now witnessing a discussion on the IPR list, which makes me believe that the IPR disclosure statement may not be 'stable'. Will a RFC3667 revision be available until July 1st?
Regards,
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no]
> Sent: 15 June, 2004 5:52 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: Ops-Area (E-mail); wgchairs@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: IPR and Copyright Statements
>
>
> Yes, you should conform to the RFC 3667 guidelines.
>
> The only reason (excuse, really) not to do so is you're not
> using xml2rfc,
> and are only doing minor tweaks to an old document.
>
> At the moment, D-Day will not be before July 1 - it took a
> while to get our
> guidance house in order.
>
> Harald
>
> --On 15. juni 2004 14:35 +0300 "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)"
> <dromasca@avaya.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Harald,
> >
> > What is the status of the application of RFC 3667? I am on
> the verge of
> > submitting a few Internet-Drafts, and I am wondering whether:
> >
> > - I should include he IPR Disclosure Acknowledgement
> described in Section
> > 5.1 of RFC 3667 (required in all Internet-Drafts)
> >
> > - The Copyright Notice described in Section 5.4 of RFC 3667
> (for all IETF
> > Documents).
> >
> > You have indicated in a previous message that June 15 would be the
> > D-Day, but you also said 'we're not firmly wedded to a date
> until we have
> > all the guideline documents updated'. The ops-area page now
> points to a
> > new version of the MIB guidelines document, which points to
> RFC 3667.
> >
> > So, what is the guideline? What do I do if I need to submit
> an I-D today?
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>