[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: IPR and Copyright Statements



However, I am just now witnessing a discussion on the IPR list, which makes me believe that the IPR disclosure statement may not be 'stable'. Will a RFC3667 revision be available until July 1st?

Regards,

Dan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no]
> Sent: 15 June, 2004 5:52 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: Ops-Area (E-mail); wgchairs@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: IPR and Copyright Statements
> 
> 
> Yes, you should conform to the RFC 3667 guidelines.
> 
> The only reason (excuse, really) not to do so is you're not 
> using xml2rfc, 
> and are only doing minor tweaks to an old document.
> 
> At the moment, D-Day will not be before July 1 - it took a 
> while to get our 
> guidance house in order.
> 
>                            Harald
> 
> --On 15. juni 2004 14:35 +0300 "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" 
> <dromasca@avaya.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> >
> > Harald,
> >
> > What is the status of the application of RFC 3667? I am on 
> the verge of
> > submitting a few Internet-Drafts, and I am wondering whether:
> >
> > - I should include he IPR Disclosure Acknowledgement 
> described in Section
> > 5.1 of RFC 3667 (required in all Internet-Drafts)
> >
> > - The Copyright Notice described in Section 5.4 of RFC 3667 
> (for all IETF
> > Documents).
> >
> >  You have indicated in a previous message that June 15 would be the
> > D-Day, but you also said 'we're not firmly wedded to a date 
> until we have
> > all the guideline documents updated'. The ops-area page now 
> points to a
> > new version of the MIB guidelines document, which points to 
> RFC 3667.
> >
> > So, what is the guideline? What do I do if I need to submit 
> an I-D today?
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
>