Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
I didn't understand this section as "which management activities are envisioned for a given protocol or how a protocol fits into existing management infrastructures", but as a way to suggest/strongly suggest/impose (*) that the protocol manageability would be thought of from day one. And to make sure ALL the manageability aspects would be thought of, I suggested FCAPSOn Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 08:47:14PM -0500, David B Harrington wrote:I disagree that the S in FCAPS manageability is already addressed by Security Considerations. Considering security for a technology and for the security of the management of the technology are different topics.I am not sure the S if FCAPS is restricted to "Management Security". Having said that, I do not believe that structuring the management considerations section according to FCAPS is terrible useful. I think this section is only useful if it is short and sharp and explains in very abstract terms which management activities are envisioned for a given protocol or how a protocol fits into existing management infrastructures. (*) choose what you want. Regards, Benoit. /js |