[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: text format of configurations
- To: Joe Provo <crimson@gweep.net>
- Subject: Re: text format of configurations
- From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: ops-nm@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:07:12 -0700
- Envelope-to: ops-nm-data@psg.com
> re: 03 & 04. strong echo of Adi's statement. if the vendor only supplied
> compiled configurations, they should be required to decompile when speaking
> the 'Infrastructure Management Protocol'
I think is is one area where operators and vendors may run into a
sticking-point... Jon and I talked about it at some length. It's _really
important_ to operators that we have a uniform configuration syntax
between devices, so that we don't have to train technicians on several
different kinds of syntax.
This obviously benefits competitive vendors, and is a potential problem
for incumbent vendors, if the incumbent vendors aren't competitive. If
the syntax for a new device is the same as that which our techs are used
to, we can deploy it without the cost of retraining, which means we're
more likely to buy it.
-Bill