RE: Final pass on BOF issues for -01

["Smith, Donald" <Donald.Smith@qwest.com>]

I am NOT saying they should profit.
I am saying that currently they do (in some instances).

I am also saying they do need to be able to end of life products
at some point.

Donald.Smith@qwest.com GCIA
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xAF00EDCC
(coffee != sleep) & (!coffee == sleep)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Hollis [mailto:goemon@anime.net]
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 6:51 PM
> To: George Jones
> Cc: opsec@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Final pass on BOF issues for -01
> 
> 
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, George Jones wrote:
> > >From a vendor perspective, I can see this as a series of open-ended
> > expenses (read: unprofitable).
> 
> vendors should profit from defects? i categorically disagree.
> 
> is it ok for e.g. ford to manufacture defective product, then 
> charge you 
> money to get it fixed? the courts say no.
> 
> -Dan
> -- 
> [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
> 
>