[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: More BCP: revenge of RS232 and CLIs


On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Randy Bush wrote:

> > Why not specify ATLEAST 9600/8/n/1 ?
>
> is 1200 baud less secure?
>

nope, I guess I should restate with:

why not specify X/Y/Z/W
with X = some boud
     Y = some bits length setting
     Z = some parity
     W = some stop bits value

like I said later (earlier?) I don't care about the speed, I care that it
IS there and that in the worst case I can haul out my vt100, drive to the
pop and reconfig a device in that manner...