[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: opsec and 2119 keywords
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 10, 2004 05:30:05 -0800 George Jones <gmj@pobox.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This will always be the case. Again, note the language that has been
> > added to the abstract (current working version):
> >
> > 04> Operators and vendors should carefully consider the
> > 04> individual requirements listed here in the context of local policy,
> > 04> operational and security needs. One size does not fit all.
>
> It should be noted that it's not sufficient to say this in the abstract; it
> should also be included prominently in the main body of the
> document.
It does in several places in the front matter. I checked before
adding to abstract. I think people are just missing it.
---George