[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: opsec and 2119 keywords



On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:

>
>
> On Wednesday, March 10, 2004 05:30:05 -0800 George Jones <gmj@pobox.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This will always be the case.  Again, note the language that has been
> > added to the abstract (current working version):
> >
> > 04>   Operators and vendors should carefully consider the
> > 04>   individual requirements listed here in the context of local policy,
> > 04>   operational and security needs.  One size does not fit all.
>
> It should be noted that it's not sufficient to say this in the abstract; it
> should also be included prominently in the main body of the
> document.

It does in several places in the front matter.  I checked before
adding to abstract.  I think people are just missing it.

---George