Re: survey of isp security practices

[David Barak <thegameiam@yahoo.com>]

--- "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb@gettcomm.com> wrote:

> I need to think some more about exactly where it
> would go and what 
> would be in it, but my initial reaction is that
> there needs to be a 
> section on "routing".  I'd move blackholes/sinkholes
> out of 
> filtering, as well as uRPF, and add the issues of
> routing protocol 
> security, sanity checks on routing (correlation with
> routing 
> registries, prefix limits, etc.), and
> information-gathering from such 
> things as flaps and generic changes-from-baseline of
> routing protocol 
> specifics.

I agree with Howard that "routing" should be a major
heading, but I think that it has two major categories:
source validation, and information validation.  



=====
David Barak
-fully RFC 1925 compliant-


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com