[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TCP small fragments

To: "J.A. Terranson" <measl@mfn.org>
Subject: Re: TCP small fragments
From: pmrn <pmrn@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:38:01 -0500
Cc: Greg Sayadian <gsayadian@aol.com>, opsec@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20050217055402.H29515@ubzr.zsa.bet>
References: <20050216142906.54C653C03BD@berkshire.machshav.com> <42136137.903@aol.com> <a45c96fe9cc6383eec029adb8b2aadb9@mac.com> <421394A7.5000209@aol.com> <026223dbb1352dc99cd7fee1fd22f2e3@mac.com> <20050217055402.H29515@ubzr.zsa.bet>

correct
On Feb 17, 2005, at 6:55 AM, J.A. Terranson wrote:

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, pmrn wrote:

<snip>

Coming back to original point on stacks and server crashing, a well
designed stack/driver should not process anything that does not adhere
to specification, it should simply ignore and act on them.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I believe that should have been "ignore and NOT act" ?

--
Yours,

J.A. Terranson
sysadmin@mfn.org
0xBD4A95BF

"Quadriplegics think before they write stupid pointless
shit...because they have to type everything with their noses."

http://www.tshirthell.com/

Pall Ramanathan
Work: 678-9359670
Mobile: 678-576-7105

www.amalannetworks.com

Learn like you will live for ever and Live like you will die tomorrow-Gandhi

References:
- Re: TCP small fragments
  - From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
- Re: TCP small fragments
  - From: Greg Sayadian <gsayadian@aol.com>
- Re: TCP small fragments
  - From: pmrn <pmrn@mac.com>
- Re: TCP small fragments
  - From: Greg Sayadian <gsayadian@aol.com>
- Re: TCP small fragments
  - From: pmrn <pmrn@mac.com>
- Re: TCP small fragments
  - From: "J.A. Terranson" <measl@mfn.org>

Prev by Date: Re: TCP small fragments
Next by Date: Meeting time for Minneapolis / Call for Presentations
Previous by thread: Re: TCP small fragments
Next by thread: Re: Layer 2 access and Current Practices
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread